Joe Piacentile: Common Terms In The Courtroom

By Bob Oliver


If you want to talk about terminology, as it relates to the courtroom, it goes without saying that there are various points of interest to make note of. I am sure that others will agree with this, especially if they served as jurors in the past. Joe Piacentile can recognize a number of common terms, though it's easy to imagine that others will be less familiar. With that said, here is what you should know if you want to become familiar with such lingo.

Damages - When someone takes another person to court, more often than not, money is the goal. This is used in order to cover any kind of harm or ill doing that was conducted. For instance, if someone wrote a slanderous article about another person - which turned out to be untrue - the writer would be sued. The money that would be received from the case, provided it is successful on the part of the plaintiff, would be known as the damages. This is just one term that Joseph Piacentile can tell you of.

Cross-Examination - When you want to get information from someone, in the courtroom, you will take part in a cross-examination. This practice involves the distribution of details given during a particular hearing, which allows the judge to make a more informed decision. During this event, the individual being cross-examined must be as honest as possible. Failure to do so can result in some degree of punishment given to that dishonest individual.

Breach - This is what happens when you break a binding rule or guideline that has been set in place. For instance, if you have been contracted to work in a particular establishment for a certain length of time, a legal agreement has been set in place. Going against said agreement can be seen as a breach, which is against the law. Fortunately, an instance like this is where names such as Joe Piacentile can provide even greater expertise.

Verdict - Without question, you should know what term is all about. When it's said that the judge has reached a verdict, it means that the individual in question has determined whether an accused party is innocent or guilty. This is done based on the litany of details supplied in the courtroom, whether through physical evidenced or, as discussed earlier, extensive cross-examination. Without these details set in place, it's unlikely that a verdict would be found.




About the Author: